2002 CEDA College Final: Fort Hays RR vs Michigan State CM
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'02
🏆FinalCollege

2002 CEDA College Final: Fort Hays RR vs Michigan State CM

CEDA 2002 Finals - Fort Hays RR vs. Michigan State CM

Apr 6, 20021.8k

2002 Cross Examination Debate Association National Tournament Finals Affirmative: Fort Hays Jason Regnier Joe Ramsey Negative: Michigan State Austin Carson Calum Matheson

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — First Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

DoublesKentucky·Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Ukraine Long-Range 2NR: NATO Unity DA Decision: 2-1 Aff (Reeves*, Repko, Spiers)

Ukraine Long-Range
NATO Unity DA
Oct 7, 20260.3k
DoublesKentucky·Lily Severson

3-0 for Iowa on the affirmative

Sep 28, 20261.3k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.