2010 CEDA College Final: Oklahoma GW (#10) vs Whitman CS (#9)
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'10
🏆FinalCollege

2010 CEDA College Final: Oklahoma GW (#10) vs Whitman CS (#9)

CEDA 2010 Finals - Oklahoma GW vs. Whitman CS

Apr 6, 20101.6k

2010 Cross Examination Debate Association National Tournament Final Round Affirmative - Oklahoma RJ Giglio Nick Watts Negative - Whitman Nate Cohn Daniel Straus

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — First Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

DoublesKentucky·Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Ukraine Long-Range 2NR: NATO Unity DA Decision: 2-1 Aff (Reeves*, Repko, Spiers)

Ukraine Long-Range
NATO Unity DA
Oct 7, 20260.3k
DoublesKentucky·Lily Severson

3-0 for Iowa on the affirmative

Sep 28, 20261.3k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.