2017 Tournament of Champions Practice Round Hunter College NP (Aff) vs. Stuyvesant KF (Neg) — Watch with transcript
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Policy

  • CX

    HS Policy Teams

  • LD

    HS Debate 1v1

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Leaderboard

Practice

  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace
  • Practice Partners
  • Practice Drills
  • AI Judge Decision

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Coach Workspace
  • Research Progress
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Team Rankings
  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Formats & Rules
  • Glossary of Terms
  • All Features
  • All Videos

  • College Policy

    College Policy

  • HS Policy Teams

    HS Policy Teams

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Debate 1v1

    HS Debate 1v1

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

  • WSD

  • ACC

  • Speech

Research

Practice

Coaching

Insights

DocsBlogGitHubGithubSupportPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
Affirmative Strategy'17

2017 Tournament of Champions Practice Round Hunter College NP (Aff) vs. Stuyvesant KF (Neg)

Apr 12, 20172.2k

Practice debate between Katherine Fennell and Nina Potischmann, judged by Paras Kumar. Here are some suggestions for redos-- 1. Give Nina's 2ar but signpost better--start with paradigm issues and then win the interp/counterinterp. Don't drop the competing interps is more arbitrary argument if you go for CI. 2. Practice Nina's 2ar going for neg doesn't meet its reasonability brightline. Kick out of competing interps. 3. Practice Nina's 1ar going for framework and substance instead of 1ar theory. 4. Practice Katherine's substantive 2NR and explain the weighing better on why the PIC outweighs the aff. Also see if you can cover theory the way Katherine does, and make the 2NR answers to the resolvability standard on the first shell clearer. ———————

Comments

Loading comments…

Related videos

Elevating the AFF, Part 5---Efficiency
Affirmative StrategyKentucky Debate

Typing Resources Ong, K., et al. QWERTY: The Effects of Typing on Web Search Behavior. Association for Computing Machinery, ...

Jan 14, 20260.1k
Elevating the AFF, Part 2---Planning
Affirmative StrategyKentucky Debate

Music Hive Of Industry, Harvey Wade---https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW8fxgUvkJg Absorption, Javier ...

Jan 14, 20260.2k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.

DocsSettings