Strake Jesuit HW vs Stuyvesant JR Glenbrooks Octos — Watch with transcript
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Policy

  • CX

    HS Policy Teams

  • LD

    HS Debate 1v1

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Leaderboard

Practice

  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace
  • Practice Partners
  • Practice Drills
  • AI Judge Decision

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Coach Workspace
  • Research Progress
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Team Rankings
  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Formats & Rules
  • Glossary of Terms
  • All Features

  • All Videos

  • College Policy

    College Policy

  • HS Policy Teams

    HS Policy Teams

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Debate 1v1

    HS Debate 1v1

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

  • WSD

  • ACC

  • Speech

Research

Practice

Coaching

Insights

DocsBlogGitHubGithubSupportPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'17Octos

Strake Jesuit HW vs Stuyvesant JR Glenbrooks Octos

Dec 30, 20178.6k

Strake Jesuit is pro while Stuyvesant is con. The topic is, "Resolved: Resolved: The United States should require universal background checks for all gun sales and transfer of ownership." Strake Jesuit wins 2-1.

Comments

Loading comments…

Pro Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

Round 6Glenbrooks LD · National Symposium

The 1AC was Light Pollution. The 2NR was T - No Humans. The decision was for the Affirmative (Alderete). Resolved: The United States ought to rewild substantial tracts of land.

Light Pollution
T - No Humans
Dec 11, 20251.2k
OctosGlenbrooks LD · National Symposium

The 1AC was Rewilding. The 2NR was Setcol. The decision was a 2-1 for the Negative (Robinson, King, Hertzig*). Resolved: The United States ought to rewild substantial tracts of land.

Rewilding
Setcol
Dec 11, 20251.9k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.

DocsSettings