Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'17
R2PF

2017 TOC PF Round 2: Cambridge OS vs PCDS PW

2017 Tournament of Champions Round 2 PCDS PW (Neg) vs. Cambridge OS (Aff)

Jun 29, 20172.6k

Round starts at 6:23. Parker Whitfill negates vs. Oliver Sussman in Round 2 of TOC (they also debate in semis of TOC, where Parker is side locked aff). Judge is Sam Azbel. 2NR goes for evidence ethics, decision is for the negative. Suggestions for redos: 1) Don't miscut or mistag your evidence. Makes winning a lot harder than it needs to be. 2) Redo this 1ar where you generate offense in the 1ar for miscutting ev good OR contest competing interps heavily. Also don't drop that academic honesty comes lexically prior other impacts. 3) Practice the 2N as is, it's pretty good. Also try the 2N where you just go for substance and kick out of academic honesty. ——————— Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/debatedrills Join our newsletter: http://www.debatedrills.com

Comments

Loading comments…

Pro Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

R5TOC·Outreach Debate

Westwood SP debates 1st on the Negative, while Emerald AG debates 2nd on the Affirmative. Before opening the description and viewing the results, we recommend flowing the round yourself and coming up with your own decision. Emerald AG (AFF) wins. If you have any recordings you'd like to have uploaded, please email us at outreachdebate@gmail.com. The topic being debated in this round is: Resolved: The United States should eliminate the President’s authority to deploy military forces abroad without Congressional approval.

Jul 25, 20260.3k
DoublesTOC·VikrantDebate

The 1AC was Disarm. The 2NR was the North Korea DA and an Advantage CP. The decision was for the negative (Lewis, Greer, Keller).

Apr 23, 20260.7k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.

2017 TOC PF Round 2: Cambridge OS vs PCDS PW