2019 Heart of Texas Invitational LD Octas: Strake Jesuit WH vs Harker AM (Skep/TT)
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'19
Top 16 OctosLD
Skep/TT

2019 Heart of Texas Invitational LD Octas: Strake Jesuit WH vs Harker AM (Skep/TT)

St.Marks 2019 Octos Strake Jesuit WH (Aff) vs Harker AM (Neg) audio only

Jan 1, 20190.9k

Topic: Resolved: In the United States, colleges and universities ought not consider standardized tests in undergraduate admissions decisions. Arguments: Skep/TT, Fast Neg 2NR args: Skep/TT Event: 2019 Heart of Texas Invitational Octos

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

R5Nano · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Panspermia 2NR: Xi Legitimacy DA Decision: Neg (Dosch)

Oct 21, 20260.0k
DoublesNano · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: NEW European Union 2NR: NATO Bad Decision: 3-0 Aff (Jacob Nails, Eli Nelson, Ava Wegmann-Gatarz)

NEW European Union
NATO Bad
Oct 13, 20261.4k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.