2018 Glenbrooks PF Round 6: Lincoln Sudbury Cigale & Shankar vs Ardrey Kell #99 Hazeldine & Brown

Dec 9, 201812k

Lincoln Sudbury is pro while Ardrey Kell is con. Sudbury wins the round. The resolution is, "Resolved: the United States should establish price controls on the pharmaceutical industry."

Comments

Loading comments…

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges:Flow judge

Flow judgeA technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.Lay judgeA parent or community judge with no debate background who votes for the clearer, more persuasive side and discounts jargon, speed and technical drops.PolicymakerA judge who compares the world of the plan to the status quo or a competitive alternative and votes on net benefits and comparative risk.Critique-friendlyA judge open to framework, critiques and performance, who weighs the debaters' representations and the role of the ballot before the policy consequences.Theory-firstA judge who resolves procedurals first under competing interpretations and rewards clean shell execution; theory needs no proven abuse.TraditionalA traditional judge who wants a clear value and criterion (or clear weighing in PF) and clash on the resolution, and is skeptical of plans, spreading and tricks.

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.


R6Glenbrooks LD · National Symposium The 1AC was Light Pollution. The 2NR was T - No Humans. The decision was for the Affirmative (Alderete). Resolved: The United States ought to rewild substantial tracts of land.	Light Pollution	T - No Humans	Dec 11, 2025	1.3k
OctasGlenbrooks LD · National Symposium The 1AC was Rewilding. The 2NR was Setcol. The decision was a 2-1 for the Negative (Robinson, King, Hertzig*). Resolved: The United States ought to rewild substantial tracts of land.	Rewilding	Setcol	Dec 11, 2025	2.0k

2018 Glenbrooks PF Round 6: Lincoln Sudbury Cigale & Shankar vs Ardrey Kell #99 Hazeldine & Brown

Dec 9, 201812k

Lincoln Sudbury is pro while Ardrey Kell is con. Sudbury wins the round. The resolution is, "Resolved: the United States should establish price controls on the pharmaceutical industry."

Comments

Loading comments…

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges:Flow judge

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

All Videos

College Team Debate

HS Team Debate

HS Public Forum

HS Individual Debate

Lectures

Watch History

Greatest of All-Time

My Favorites

2018 Glenbrooks PF Round 6: Lincoln Sudbury Cigale & Shankar vs Ardrey Kell #99 Hazeldine & Brown

Comments

Related videos

All Videos

College Team Debate

HS Team Debate

HS Public Forum

HS Individual Debate

Lectures

Watch History

Greatest of All-Time

My Favorites

2018 Glenbrooks PF Round 6: Lincoln Sudbury Cigale & Shankar vs Ardrey Kell #99 Hazeldine & Brown

Comments

Related videos