2019 Glenbrooks LD LD Final: Glenbrooks LD Finals Santa Monica RE vs West Des Moines Valley AJ
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'19
🏆FinalLD

2019 Glenbrooks LD LD Final: Glenbrooks LD Finals Santa Monica RE vs West Des Moines Valley AJ

2019 Glenbrooks LD Finals Santa Monica RE (Aff) vs West Des Moines Valley AJ (Neg)

Nov 29, 20198.2k

This is an elimination debate (round of 2) from the 2019 Glenbrooks Tournament between Rex Evans and Animesh Joshi. The topic for this debate was resolved: The United States ought to eliminate subsidies for fossil fuels. The debate is a util affirmative vs an NC and some util off positions. You can view the documents from this debate at the following links: Aff: https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Santa%20Monica/Evans%20Aff/Santa%20Monica-Evans-Aff-Glenbrooks-Finals.docx Neg: https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/Valley/Joshi%20Neg The decision was a 2-1 for the affirmative Rex Evans. - - - - - - - - - - - Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/debatedrills Join our newsletter: http://www.debatedrills.com

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

R5Nano · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Panspermia 2NR: Xi Legitimacy DA Decision: Neg (Dosch)

Oct 21, 20260.0k
DoublesNano · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: NEW European Union 2NR: NATO Bad Decision: 3-0 Aff (Jacob Nails, Eli Nelson, Ava Wegmann-Gatarz)

NEW European Union
NATO Bad
Oct 13, 20261.4k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.