2019 Loyola PF Octas: Loyola Octas Santa Monica RE vs Westlake EE
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'19
Top 16 OctosPF

2019 Loyola PF Octas: Loyola Octas Santa Monica RE vs Westlake EE

2019 Loyola Octas Santa Monica RE (Aff) vs Westlake EE (Neg)

Sep 8, 20191.8k

This is an elimination debate (round of 16) from the 2019 Loyola Lincoln-Douglas Debate Invitational between Rex Evans and Ethan Elasky. The topic for this debate was resolved: In the United States, colleges and universities ought not consider standardized tests in undergraduate admissions decisions. You can view the documents from this debate at the following links: Aff: https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Santa%20Monica/Evans%20Aff/Santa%20Monica-Evans-Aff-Loyola-Round1.docx Neg: https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Westlake/Elasky%20Neg/Westlake-Elasky-Neg-Loyola-Octas.docx The decision was a 3-0 for the affirmative Rex Evans (Julian Kuffour, Matthew McFadden, Jonas Le Barillec). ——————— Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/debatedrills Join our newsletter: http://www.debatedrills.com

Comments

Loading comments…

Pro Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

R3Loyola · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Space Colonization 2NR: Restraint Reversal DA Decision: AFF (Joseph Hong)

Space Colonization
Restraint Reversal DA
Sep 18, 20263.2k
QuartersLoyola · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Insanity 2NR: T Plea Bargaining Decision: 2-1 AFF (Dylan Liu*, Gordon Krauss, Jeremy Kim)

Insanity
T Plea Bargaining
Nov 28, 20251.3k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.