2022 NDT College Semis: Southern California KS (#5) vs Dartmouth SV (#4)
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'22
Top 4 SemisCollege

2022 NDT College Semis: Southern California KS (#5) vs Dartmouth SV (#4)

NDT 2022 - Semis - Southern California KS (Aff) v. Dartmouth SV (Neg)

Apr 5, 202210k

NDT 2022 - Semis Affirmative - Southern California KS Negative - Dartmouth SV Panel - Dustin Meyers-Levy, Scott Harris, Ned Gidley, Jacob Hegna, Brandon Kelley

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — First Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

QuartersNDT·Jacob Wilkus

NDT 2022 - Quarters Affirmative - Northwestern DF Negative - Southern California KS Panel - Mikaela Malsin, Ned Gidley, John Turner, Jason Regnier, Kevin Clarke

Apr 5, 20226.8k
OctasNDT·Jacob Wilkus

NDT 2022 Aff - Emory GK Neg - Minnesota PR Panel - Ned Gidley, Katie Wimsatt, Dan Bannister, Anthony Trufanov, Jacob Hegna Decision - 3-2 Negative (Bannister and Wimsatt sat)

Apr 5, 20227.2k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.