Harvard Westlake 2022 Doubles - Prospect ST vs Greenhill AK — Watch with transcript
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Policy

  • CX

    HS Policy Teams

  • LD

    HS Debate 1v1

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Leaderboard

Practice

  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace
  • Practice Partners
  • Practice Drills
  • AI Judge Decision

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Coach Workspace
  • Research Progress
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Team Rankings
  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Formats & Rules
  • Glossary of Terms
  • All Features

  • All Videos

  • College Policy

    College Policy

  • HS Policy Teams

    HS Policy Teams

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Debate 1v1

    HS Debate 1v1

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

  • WSD

  • ACC

  • Speech

Research

Practice

Coaching

Insights

DocsBlogGitHubGithubSupportPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'22DoublesPolicyT-Subsets

Harvard Westlake 2022 Doubles - Prospect ST vs Greenhill AK

Jan 1, 20221.5k

Topic: Resolved: Justice requires open borders for human migration. Arguments: Policy v Topicality, T-Subsets, Fast Aff 1AC args: Policy Neg 2NR args: T-Subsets Event: 2022 Harvard-Westlake Double Octos

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

SemisHarvard-Westlake·SU Debate Rounds

Judges: Tyler Thur, Ilan Boguslavsky, and Molly Urfalian Decision: 2-1 Aff (Ilan sits) 1AC was Stock v2 1NC was Reverse T-AY and a Suspicious Counterplan. Rest was nuke war good 2NR was time travel graphene sperm counts and a couple other things like Ai maybe? 2AR was like well yeah but like nuclear war is like a bad thing though 🥺 should’ve restarted with the Cardenas K in the 1AR I hate these debates

Stock v2
Jan 21, 20261.0k
Round 5Harvard-Westlake RR · SU Debate Rounds

Judge: CURTIS ORTEGA!! Decision: Aff lol 1AC was Bombers 1NC was T-No Spec, T-Delivery Systems, Midterms DA and a Counterplan i made up in the speech 2NR was Midterms DA I can’t even be mad… like, this guy is pretty good believe it or not folks. (I blame the unrelated horrible pre tournament interpersonal drama I had over break 😡)

Bombers
Midterms
Jan 21, 20260.9k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.

DocsSettings