2024 Bronx LD Quarters: Brophy TJ vs Isidore Newman AB (Theory)
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'24
Top 8 QuartersLD
Theory

2024 Bronx LD Quarters: Brophy TJ vs Isidore Newman AB (Theory)

New York City Invitational 2024 LD Quarters - Brophy TJ vs. Isidore Newman AB

Jan 1, 20240.8k

Topic: Resolved: The United States ought to require that workers receive a living wage. Arguments: Theory, Fast Neg 2NR args: Theory Event: 2024 Bronx Quarters

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

FinalBronx · PF Videos

Lincoln Sudbury LS is pro while MSJ KM is con. The topic is, "Resolved: deployment of anti-missile systems is in South Korea's best interests." MSJ wins 5-0.

Dec 31, 20251.5k
OctasBronx · Outreach Debate

Topic: Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially expand its surveillance infrastructure along its southern border. Arguments: Policy v Policy, Fast Aff 1AC args: Policy Neg 2NR args: Policy Event: 2025 Bronx Octos

Policy
Policy
Jan 1, 20250.6k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.