[2025] Damus Hollywood Invitational Finals - Harvard-Westlake KM vs Peninsula SU — Watch with transcript
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Policy

  • CX

    HS Policy Teams

  • LD

    HS Debate 1v1

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Leaderboard

Practice

  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace
  • Practice Partners
  • Practice Drills
  • AI Judge Decision

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Coach Workspace
  • Research Progress
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Team Rankings
  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Formats & Rules
  • Glossary of Terms
  • All Features

  • All Videos

  • College Policy

    College Policy

  • HS Policy Teams

    HS Policy Teams

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Debate 1v1

    HS Debate 1v1

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

  • WSD

  • ACC

  • Speech

Research

Practice

Coaching

Insights

DocsBlogGitHubGithubSupportPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'25🏆Finals

[2025] Damus Hollywood Invitational Finals - Harvard-Westlake KM vs Peninsula SU

Nov 15, 20251.2k

Judges: Molly Urfalian, Riley Reichel, Ilan Bougaslavsky Decision: NEG (3-0) 1AC was Lights 1NC was T-Rewild, Impeachment Counterplan, Spill Over DA, and a Contention Counterplan about Satellites 1AR said if and only if CPs were bad 2NR was Impeachment lol 2AR was pretty heat fwiw if I had a dollar for every time, without my own computer or any of my stuff, I went for a random throwaway time suck position in an elim round at this tournament, I'd have $2. That's not a lot but it's still weird it happened twice. Yay debate!

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — First Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

Double OctafinalsNano Nagle · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: NEW European Union 2NR: NATO Bad Decision: 3-0 Aff (Jacob Nails, Eli Nelson, Ava Wegmann-Gatarz)

NEW European Union
NATO Bad
Oct 13, 20260.8k
R6Nano · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: ISS 2NR: New Advantages Bad, Space Militarization DA Decision: Neg (Wegmann-Gatarz)

ISS
New Advantages Bad, Space Militarization DA
Oct 13, 20260.3k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.

DocsSettings