Harvard PF Finals 2025 | Lincoln-Sudbury KH (Neg 1st) vs Plano West AB (Aff 2nd) — Watch with transcript
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Policy

  • CX

    HS Policy Teams

  • LD

    HS Debate 1v1

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Leaderboard

Practice

  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace
  • Practice Partners
  • Practice Drills
  • AI Judge Decision

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Coach Workspace
  • Research Progress
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Team Rankings
  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Formats & Rules
  • Glossary of Terms
  • All Features

  • All Videos

  • College Policy

    College Policy

  • HS Policy Teams

    HS Policy Teams

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Debate 1v1

    HS Debate 1v1

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

  • WSD

  • ACC

  • Speech

Research

Practice

Coaching

Insights

DocsBlogGitHubGithubSupportPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'25🏆FinalsPolicyPolicy

Harvard PF Finals 2025 | Lincoln-Sudbury KH (Neg 1st) vs Plano West AB (Aff 2nd)

Jan 1, 20254.8k

Topic: Resolved: The United States should accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Arguments: Policy v Policy, Trad Aff 1AC args: Policy Neg 2NR args: Policy Event: 2025 Harvard Finals

Comments

Loading comments…

Pro Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

QuartersHarvard Westlake·Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Gaul 2NR: North Korea PIC Decision: 2-1 Neg (Rayeed Rahman*, Wyeth Renwick, Julian Kuffour)

Gaul
North Korea PIC
Jan 23, 20262.7k
OctosHarvard Westlake·Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Poseidon 2NR: T Subsets Decision: 3-0 Aff (Wyeth Renwick, Anish Bhadani, Coralynn Yang)

Poseidon
T Subsets
Jan 23, 20261.7k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.

DocsSettings