2025 TOC LD LD Round 2: Barrington AC (ICC) vs Harker AA (ORL CP)

May 9, 20250.7k

The 1AC was ICC, the 2NR was ORL CP. The decision was for the Affirmative (Krauss.) Resolved: The United States ought to become party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and/or the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

Comments

Loading comments…

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges:Flow judge

Flow judgeA technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.Lay judgeA parent or community judge with no debate background who votes for the clearer, more persuasive side and discounts jargon, speed and technical drops.PolicymakerA judge who compares the world of the plan to the status quo or a competitive alternative and votes on net benefits and comparative risk.Critique-friendlyA judge open to framework, critiques and performance, who weighs the debaters' representations and the role of the ballot before the policy consequences.Theory-firstA judge who resolves procedurals first under competing interpretations and rewards clean shell execution; theory needs no proven abuse.TraditionalA traditional judge who wants a clear value and criterion (or clear weighing in PF) and clash on the resolution, and is skeptical of plans, spreading and tricks.

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

2025 TOC LD LD Round 2: Barrington AC (ICC) vs Harker AA (ORL CP)

May 9, 20250.7k

Comments

Loading comments…

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges:Flow judge

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.


R5Nano · Lynbrook Debate 1AC: Panspermia 2NR: Xi Legitimacy DA Decision: Neg (Dosch)			Oct 21, 2026	0.7k
DoublesNano · Lynbrook Debate 1AC: NEW European Union 2NR: NATO Bad Decision: 3-0 Aff (Jacob Nails, Eli Nelson, Ava Wegmann-Gatarz)	NEW European Union	NATO Bad	Oct 13, 2026	1.8k


R5Nano · Lynbrook Debate 1AC: Panspermia 2NR: Xi Legitimacy DA Decision: Neg (Dosch)			Oct 21, 2026	0.7k
DoublesNano · Lynbrook Debate 1AC: NEW European Union 2NR: NATO Bad Decision: 3-0 Aff (Jacob Nails, Eli Nelson, Ava Wegmann-Gatarz)	NEW European Union	NATO Bad	Oct 13, 2026	1.8k

All Videos

College Team Debate

HS Team Debate

HS Public Forum

HS Individual Debate

Lectures

Watch History

Greatest of All-Time

My Favorites

2025 TOC LD LD Round 2: Barrington AC (ICC) vs Harker AA (ORL CP)

Comments

Related videos

All Videos

College Team Debate

HS Team Debate

HS Public Forum

HS Individual Debate

Lectures

Watch History

Greatest of All-Time

My Favorites

2025 TOC LD LD Round 2: Barrington AC (ICC) vs Harker AA (ORL CP)

Comments

Related videos