NSDA Nationals 2025 | Round 9 | BASIS Peoria GV vs. SF Jefferson WH | Public Forum Debate — Watch with transcript
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Policy

  • CX

    HS Policy Teams

  • LD

    HS Debate 1v1

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Leaderboard

Practice

  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace
  • Practice Partners
  • Practice Drills
  • AI Judge Decision

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Coach Workspace
  • Research Progress
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Team Rankings
  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Formats & Rules
  • Glossary of Terms
  • All Features

  • All Videos

  • College Policy

    College Policy

  • HS Policy Teams

    HS Policy Teams

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Debate 1v1

    HS Debate 1v1

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

  • WSD

  • ACC

  • Speech

Research

Practice

Coaching

Insights

DocsBlogGitHubGithubSupportPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'25PolicyPolicy

NSDA Nationals 2025 | Round 9 | BASIS Peoria GV vs. SF Jefferson WH | Public Forum Debate

Jan 1, 20250.4k

Topic: Resolved: On balance, in the United States, the benefits of presidential executive orders outweigh the harms. Arguments: Policy v Policy, Trad Aff 1AC args: Policy Neg 2NR args: Policy Event: 2025 NSDA Nationals Round 9

Comments

Loading comments…

Pro Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

FinalNSDA · PF Videos

Monta Vista TG debates 1st on the Affirmative, while Archbishop Mitty AD debates 2nd on the Negative. Before opening the description and viewing the results, we recommend flowing the round yourself and coming up with your own decision. Monta Vista (AFF) wins on a 7-6 If you have any recordings you'd like to have uploaded, please email us at pfvideosyt@gmail.com. We have also created a new diversity and outreach team as an attempt to rebuild PF Videos and make the channel more inclusive. If you know of any diverse rounds that are not already uploaded here, please don’t hesitate to reach out. All proceeds are donated to the Urban Debate League (UDL). Resolved: On balance, in the United States, the benefits of presidential executive orders outweigh the harms.

Sep 23, 202519k
R7NSDA · Outreach Debate

Topic: Resolved: On balance, in the United States, the benefits of presidential executive orders outweigh the harms. Arguments: Policy v Policy, Lay Aff 1AC args: Policy Neg 2NR args: Policy Event: 2025 NSDA Nationals Round 7

Policy
Policy
Jan 1, 20250.2k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.

DocsSettings