2025 Harvard PF Final: Lincoln-Sudbury KH (Policy) vs Plano West AB (Policy)
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'25
🏆FinalPF
PolicyPolicy

2025 Harvard PF Final: Lincoln-Sudbury KH (Policy) vs Plano West AB (Policy)

Harvard PF Finals 2025 | Lincoln-Sudbury KH (Neg 1st) vs Plano West AB (Aff 2nd)

Jan 1, 20254.8k

Topic: Resolved: The United States should accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Arguments: Policy v Policy, Trad Aff 1AC args: Policy Neg 2NR args: Policy Event: 2025 Harvard Finals

Comments

Loading comments…

Pro Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

QuartersHarvard Westlake·Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Gaul 2NR: North Korea PIC Decision: 2-1 Neg (Rayeed Rahman*, Wyeth Renwick, Julian Kuffour)

Gaul
North Korea PIC
Jan 23, 20262.8k
OctasHarvard Westlake·Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Poseidon 2NR: T Subsets Decision: 3-0 Aff (Wyeth Renwick, Anish Bhadani, Coralynn Yang)

Poseidon
T Subsets
Jan 23, 20261.8k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.