2025 NSDA Nationals PF Round 7: Jefferson SF (Policy) vs Carrolton QS (Policy)
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'25
R7PF
PolicyPolicy

2025 NSDA Nationals PF Round 7: Jefferson SF (Policy) vs Carrolton QS (Policy)

NSDA Nationals 2025 | Round 7 | SF Jefferson SF vs Carrolton QS | Public Forum Debate

Jan 1, 20250.2k

Topic: Resolved: On balance, in the United States, the benefits of presidential executive orders outweigh the harms. Arguments: Policy v Policy, Lay Aff 1AC args: Policy Neg 2NR args: Policy Event: 2025 NSDA Nationals Round 7

Comments

Loading comments…

Pro Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

R12NSDA · Outreach Debate

Mission San Jose PS debates 1st on the Negative, while Jasper HL debates 2nd on the Affirmative. Before opening the description and viewing the results, we recommend flowing the round yourself and coming up with your own decision. Jasper HL (AFF) wins on a 2-1 decision. If you have any recordings you'd like to have uploaded, please email us at outreachdebate@gmail.com. The topic being debated in this round is: Resolved: The United States is justified in using force to remove authoritarian leaders from power.

Jun 25, 20260.3k
FinalNSDA · PF Videos

Monta Vista TG debates 1st on the Affirmative, while Archbishop Mitty AD debates 2nd on the Negative. Before opening the description and viewing the results, we recommend flowing the round yourself and coming up with your own decision. Monta Vista (AFF) wins on a 7-6 If you have any recordings you'd like to have uploaded, please email us at pfvideosyt@gmail.com. We have also created a new diversity and outreach team as an attempt to rebuild PF Videos and make the channel more inclusive. If you know of any diverse rounds that are not already uploaded here, please don’t hesitate to reach out. All proceeds are donated to the Urban Debate League (UDL). Resolved: On balance, in the United States, the benefits of presidential executive orders outweigh the harms.

Sep 23, 202520k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.