2025 Middle School TOC HS Policy Final: Marist ST vs MagnetIQ MS
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'25
🏆FinalPolicy

2025 Middle School TOC HS Policy Final: Marist ST vs MagnetIQ MS

Middle School TOC 2025 | Finals | Marist ST vs MagnetIQ MS

May 26, 20251.1k

This recording starts in second constructive. The first constructive can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A8uOqMcmSW9NxUCL1wRWri-y5XlwybzqaBVI7-5R4qo/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.rvnwcaj6b89p Marist ST debates 1st on the Negative, while MagnetIQ MS debates 2nd on the Affirmative. Before opening the description and viewing the results, we recommend flowing the round yourself and coming up with your own decision. MagnetIQ MS (AFF) wins on a 2-1. If you have any recordings you'd like to have uploaded, please email us at outreachdebate@gmail.com. The topic being debated in this round is Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase its investment in domestic nuclear energy.

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — First Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

OctasTrevian · New Trier MY

1AC Single Payer 2NR Midterms DA

Single Payer
Midterms DA
Oct 12, 20260.8k
R3Trevian · New Trier MY

1AC Single Payer 2NR Public Option CP, Democracy Bad

Single Payer
Public Option CP, Democracy Bad
Oct 11, 20260.2k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.