[2026] Harvard-Westlake Semis - Peninsula SU vs Lynbrook VV — Watch with transcript
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Policy

  • CX

    HS Policy Teams

  • LD

    HS Debate 1v1

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Leaderboard

Practice

  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace
  • Practice Partners
  • Practice Drills
  • AI Judge Decision

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Coach Workspace
  • Research Progress
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Team Rankings
  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Formats & Rules
  • Glossary of Terms
  • All Features
  • All Videos

  • College Policy

    College Policy

  • HS Policy Teams

    HS Policy Teams

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Debate 1v1

    HS Debate 1v1

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

  • WSD

  • ACC

  • Speech

Research

Practice

Coaching

Insights

DocsBlogGitHubGithubSupportPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'26SemisStock v2

[2026] Harvard-Westlake Semis - Peninsula SU vs Lynbrook VV

Jan 21, 20261.0k

Judges: Tyler Thur, Ilan Boguslavsky, and Molly Urfalian Decision: 2-1 Aff (Ilan sits) 1AC was Stock v2 1NC was Reverse T-AY and a Suspicious Counterplan. Rest was nuke war good 2NR was time travel graphene sperm counts and a couple other things like Ai maybe? 2AR was like well yeah but like nuclear war is like a bad thing though 🥺 should’ve restarted with the Cardenas K in the 1AR I hate these debates

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — First Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

Round 5Harvard-Westlake RR · SU Debate Rounds

Judge: CURTIS ORTEGA!! Decision: Aff lol 1AC was Bombers 1NC was T-No Spec, T-Delivery Systems, Midterms DA and a Counterplan i made up in the speech 2NR was Midterms DA I can’t even be mad… like, this guy is pretty good believe it or not folks. (I blame the unrelated horrible pre tournament interpersonal drama I had over break 😡)

Bombers
Midterms
Jan 21, 20260.9k
FinalsHarvard-Westlake·SU Debate Rounds

Judges: Ilan Boguslavsky, Riley Reichel, Molly Urfalian Decision: 2-1 Aff (Boguslavsky votes Neg) 1AC was Stock v2 1NC was a Court Counterplan, two T arguments one of which was Skepticism, and a critique of Util. It also spent a long time on Extinction Good 1AR took issue with all of that but also conditionality 2NR said extinction good mainly 2AR said extinction bad mainly maybe it is retirement time

Stock v2
Jan 21, 20261.6k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.

DocsSettings