2026 NDCA LD Round 5: Peninsula SU (Stock v6) vs Harker LC (Futurity Critique, Death Good, Farmed Animal Suffering)
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debate

  • CX

    HS Team Debate

  • LD

    HS Individual Debate

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Team Rankings
  • Coach Workspace
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Rules & Glossary
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debate

    College Team Debate

  • HS Team Debate

    HS Team Debate

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Individual Debate

    HS Individual Debate

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Coaching

Insights

DocsGitHubGithubSupportAboutPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'26
R5LD
Stock v6Futurity Critique, Death Good, Farmed Animal Suffering

2026 NDCA LD Round 5: Peninsula SU (Stock v6) vs Harker LC (Futurity Critique, Death Good, Farmed Animal Suffering)

[2026] NDCA Round 5 - Peninsula SU vs Harker LC

Mar 23, 20260.5k

Judge: Shreeram Modi Decision: Neg 1AC---Stock v6 1NC---Courts Counterplan. Spec Standard. Futurity Critique. Moral Skepticism. Death Good. Farmed Animal Suffering 2NR---Futurity Critique. Death Good. Farmed Animal Suffering by far worst debate of the year the speaks are lowkenuinely 1 point too high Mr. Modi

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

QuartersNDCA·Lynbrook Debate

1AC: Global Disarm 2NR: NATO CP Decision: 3-0 Neg (Shreeram Modi, Gordon Krauss, David Asafu-Adjaye) Docs: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1RAUXWDLHcFZRdAmoDUvoyQukm1QqyYeF?usp=sharing

Mar 29, 20261.9k
OctasNDCA·Peninsula LD Debate

Judges: Michael Harris, Shreeram Modi, and Jared Shirts Decision: Neg (3-0) 1AC was Nuclear Trespassing 1NC was Marxist Virtue Ethics and Topicality 2NR was Topicality 2AR was Over-Limiting

Nuclear Trespassing
Marxist Virtue Ethics, Topicality
Mar 24, 20261.1k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.