[2026] Tournament of Champions Quarters - Peninsula SU vs Harker SSe — Watch with transcript
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Policy

  • CX

    HS Policy Teams

  • LD

    HS Debate 1v1

  • PF

    HS Public Forum

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research
  • Leaderboard

Practice

  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace
  • Practice Partners
  • Practice Drills
  • AI Judge Decision

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Coach Workspace
  • Research Progress
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Team Rankings
  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Formats & Rules
  • Glossary of Terms
  • All Features

  • All Videos

  • College Policy

    College Policy

  • HS Policy Teams

    HS Policy Teams

  • HS Public Forum

    HS Public Forum

  • HS Debate 1v1

    HS Debate 1v1

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

  • WSD

  • ACC

  • Speech

Research

Practice

Coaching

Insights

DocsBlogGitHubGithubSupportPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'26Quarterfinals

[2026] Tournament of Champions Quarters - Peninsula SU vs Harker SSe

Apr 18, 20261.4k

Judge: Ari Davidson, Sachin Aggarwal, and Ethan Greer Decision: Neg 1AC was Stock Boosted 1NC was T-Reverse Subsets, No 1AR Theory, New Affs Bad, Aliens Sole Purpose, NFU/Cyber Counterplan, Bioweapons DA 1AR said Sole Purpose Bad 2NR was Bioweapons and NFU/Cyber Counterplan 2AR was Theory + Those Things I always tried my absolute best in debate to make a positive impact on others. If I hadn’t fumbled this 2AR would I have won the whole thing? That’s anyone’s bet. But it also doesn’t matter. There’s a lot of things in life I would do differently if I could but I didn’t so I can’t. Accepting what you’ve done and being willing to have done it all over again - that’s reflection. April 18 2026

Comments

Loading comments…

1AC — First Affirmative Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

Double OctafinalsNano Nagle · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: NEW European Union 2NR: NATO Bad Decision: 3-0 Aff (Jacob Nails, Eli Nelson, Ava Wegmann-Gatarz)

NEW European Union
NATO Bad
Oct 13, 20260.8k
R6Nano · Lynbrook Debate

1AC: ISS 2NR: New Advantages Bad, Space Militarization DA Decision: Neg (Wegmann-Gatarz)

ISS
New Advantages Bad, Space Militarization DA
Oct 13, 20260.3k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.

DocsSettings