Gold Tournament of Champions | Round 5 | Emerald AG vs. Westwood SP | Public Forum Debate — Watch with transcript
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings
Videos
Shared
Debate
Practice vs AI
Research
settings

Videos

  • All Videos

  • Lectures

  • NDT

    College Team Debates

  • CX

    HS Team Debates

  • LD

    HS Individual Debates

  • PF

    HS Public Forum Debates

  • Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

  • Watch History

Research

  • Research Workspace
  • Card Search
  • Team Research

Practice

  • Practice vs AI
  • Prep Workspace
  • Practice Partners
  • Practice Drills

Coaching

  • Tournaments
  • Coach Workspace
  • Laptop-less Debating
  • News & Forums

Insights

  • Team Rankings
  • Debater Level
  • Topics & Video Statistics
  • Prediction Markets
  • Formats & Rules
  • Glossary of Terms
  • All Features

Docs

  • All Videos

  • College Team Debates

    College Team Debates

  • HS Team Debates

    HS Team Debates

  • HS Public Forum Debates

    HS Public Forum Debates

  • HS Individual Debates

    HS Individual Debates

  • Lectures

    Lectures

  • Watch History

  • Greatest of All-Time

    Greatest of All-Time

  • My Favorites

    My Favorites

Research

Practice

Coaching

Insights

DocsBlogGitHubGithubSupportPrivacyRedditReddit
Video library
'26

Gold Tournament of Champions | Round 5 | Emerald AG vs. Westwood SP | Public Forum Debate

Jul 25, 20260.3k

Westwood SP debates 1st on the Negative, while Emerald AG debates 2nd on the Affirmative. Before opening the description and viewing the results, we recommend flowing the round yourself and coming up with your own decision. Emerald AG (AFF) wins. If you have any recordings you'd like to have uploaded, please email us at outreachdebate@gmail.com. The topic being debated in this round is: Resolved: The United States should eliminate the President’s authority to deploy military forces abroad without Congressional approval.

Rankings prediction

Comments

Loading comments…

Pro Constructive

Affirmative

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges

What else could the Pro Constructive have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

  • Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Related videos

DoublesTournament of Champions·VikrantDebate

The 1AC was Disarm. The 2NR was the North Korea DA and an Advantage CP. The decision was for the negative (Lewis, Greer, Keller).

Apr 23, 20260.6k
OctafinalsTournament of Champions·Lynbrook Debate
Apr 18, 20262.2k

Queue

Nothing queued. Add a related video with itsbutton and it lines up here, to play when this one ends.