Solvency Advocate Theory
- Overview
- Examples
Yes Solvency Advocate (Affirmative)
No Solvency Advocate (Negative)
We get [__] advocacies without a solvency advocate
We have a solvency advocate []
We don’t need one
- Predictability – there’s no threshold for a solvency advocate - arguably, I’m one
- Ground – negs ought test the aff from multiple angles, including cardless counterplans - topic lit doesn’t assume fiat or debate being a game with rules to ensure fairness
Prefer reasonability – competing interps crowds out substance and mandates judge intervention
Reject the arg, not the team.
