Video library

'1716-17

R6College

Playlist

3 / 4

1
2017 CEDA Nats Round 6 - Illinois SH (Aff) vs. JMU CW (Neg)
Round · CEDADebate
2
2017 CEDA Nats Round 6 - Illinois SH (Aff) vs. JMU CW (Neg)
Round · CEDADebate
▶
2017 CEDA Nats Round 6 - Illinois SH (Aff) vs. JMU CW (Neg)
Round · CEDADebate
4
2017 CEDA Nats Round 6 - Illinois SH (Aff) vs. JMU CW (Neg)
Round · CEDADebate

2017 CEDA Nats Round 6: Illinois #233 Shahriari & Herzing vs JMU #238 Conroy & Wardak

Mar 18, 20170.0k

Comments

Loading comments…

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges:Flow judge

Flow judgeA technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.Lay judgeA parent or community judge with no debate background who votes for the clearer, more persuasive side and discounts jargon, speed and technical drops.PolicymakerA judge who compares the world of the plan to the status quo or a competitive alternative and votes on net benefits and comparative risk.Critique-friendlyA judge open to framework, critiques and performance, who weighs the debaters' representations and the role of the ballot before the policy consequences.Theory-firstA judge who resolves procedurals first under competing interpretations and rewards clean shell execution; theory needs no proven abuse.TraditionalA traditional judge who wants a clear value and criterion (or clear weighing in PF) and clash on the resolution, and is skeptical of plans, spreading and tricks.

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.

Playlist

3 / 4

2017 CEDA Nats Round 6: Illinois #233 Shahriari & Herzing vs JMU #238 Conroy & Wardak

Mar 18, 20170.0k

Comments

Loading comments…

Play to where each speech begins and press Mark start, or let Detect speeches find them all — the timeline, the playing marker and each speech's captions follow.

Judges:Flow judge

What else could the 1AC have done? Claude drafts 3 alternative responses and predicts how a flow judge would vote after each, next to the speech as it was given.

Flow judge: A technical, experienced circuit judge who votes on the flow: dropped arguments are true, extensions need warrants, and weighing decides close rounds.

Simulated responses and ballots are Claude's predictions from a rough transcript, not real results. Each run is a new AI request.


Semis·CEDADebate			Mar 21, 2017	2.5k
Final·CEDADebate 🎖️	antiblackness	critical	Mar 21, 2017	15k


Semis·CEDADebate			Mar 21, 2017	2.5k
Final·CEDADebate 🎖️	antiblackness	critical	Mar 21, 2017	15k

All Videos

College Team Debate

HS Team Debate

HS Public Forum

HS Individual Debate

Lectures

Watch History

Greatest of All-Time

My Favorites

Playlist

2017 CEDA Nats Round 6: Illinois #233 Shahriari & Herzing vs JMU #238 Conroy & Wardak

Comments

Related videos

All Videos

College Team Debate

HS Team Debate

HS Public Forum

HS Individual Debate

Lectures

Watch History

Greatest of All-Time

My Favorites

Playlist

2017 CEDA Nats Round 6: Illinois #233 Shahriari & Herzing vs JMU #238 Conroy & Wardak

Comments

Related videos